Posted on

Landlord loses long-running ‘battle of the staircase’ with council

Landlord loses long-running 'battle of the staircase' with council

An HMO landlord has lost his appeal against an improvement notice ordering him to update a ‘paddle staircase’ in a case that highlights the surprising lengths some councils will go to enforce licencing rules.

A paddle staircase (pictured) is one that uses special ‘paddle’ steps that enable the use of a steep staircase at more extreme angles than would normally be possible.

Benjamin Williams told a First Tier Property Tribunal that he had made sufficient changes to the staircase leading to the third storey of his property in Roehampton Vale, London, however, a judge ruled that his efforts weren’t enough to get the notice quashed.

The landlord was first handed the notice by Wandsworth Council in December 2022 – on the basis that there was a Category 1 hazard relating to the risk of a fall on the stairs – but contested this and agreed to take steps to rectify the issue in March 2023, within six months.

Measures included either replacing the paddle steps or removing a step to create a compliant gradient, adding a grip rail and underboarding the staircase with fire resistant plasterboard.

However, an inspection found that the paddle staircase was still at a steep gradient with uneven treads.

The professional landlord, who has over 50 properites within his portfolio, explained that the staircase had been in situ since 2009 when he received his first HMO licence and that he had worked with a qualified fire safety consultant following being handed the notice.

Wandsworth Council disagreed that the works sufficiently reduced the risk to tenants and said the landlord appeared only to be considering the fire safety element of the hazard whereas its main concern was falls. If it had been changed to a traditional style staircase it would have been satisfied.

The authority demanded costs of £619 but the judge refused. He said: “The suggestion within those conditions that a paddle staircase might be acceptable was misleading and led to the applicant expending money in trying to mitigate the risks posed by the paddle staircase when in reality the only acceptable solution was to replace it with a traditional staircase.”

Original Post from landlordzone.co.uk

Posted on

Landlord fined for failing to provide documents to council

Landlord fined for failing to provide documents to council
The landlord of a suspected HMO has been fined for not producing tenancy agreements and bank statements relating to tenants.Daria Smith, the co-owner of a property in Swindon, pleaded guilty to not complying with a Section 235 Notice, which is a breach of Section 236 (1) of the Housing Act 2004.Smith was sent a notice demanding that she produce tenancy agreements and bank statements for any occupiers of her property.
The notice was sent after a prospective buyer of the home contacted Swindon council stating the property was occupied by six tenants as a licensable HMO, without such a licence being place.An investigating officer from the council then visited unannounced and spoke with one of the tenants who said there were six people living there and he wasn’t related to any of them.Witness statements were taken from two other occupiers. Both statements confirmed six people lived in the property and they were not related to one another.The property has six bedrooms with a shared kitchen and bathroom and is therefore it is believed mandatory HMO licensing applies.The notices to provide tenancy agreements and bank statements were not complied with by the landlord and, shortly after the Section 235 notice was served, the tenants were evicted or left the property.Smith stated the property had not been rented out as an HMO and had been rented to family and friends.

After failing to attend two Police and Criminal Evidence Act interviews with the council, notices were served on both registered owners but the case was only pursued against her as the rent is shown as being transferred to her and witness statements refer to Daria Smith as the landlord.

After pleading guilty at Swindon Magistrates Court to failing to comply with the Section 235 Notice, she was £300 and ordered her to pay £4,022 in court costs.